CLP 151: 1972 “The Problem of Value in Nanga Painting.” Asia House Gallery, NY

 

The Problem of Value in Nanga Painting

Subject of tonight’s lecture dictated by somewhat special circumstances of exhib. General informational lecture on Nanga ptg. would not be to point, since catalog supposed to fulfill that function.  But cat. only touches occasionally on question of value.  What is a good Nanga ptg. and what is a bad one, and how are they good & bad? What are the values of Nanga?

Under ideal circumstances, the views of the organizer of an exhib. on subject of value should be self-evident: what he puts in his exhib. is what he believes to be good.  But with most exhib., circumstances less than ideal; compromises necessary between what organizers would like to show and what they can get. In case of present exhib., this was even more than usually true.  Difficulties that would make up another lecture, one that I am not going to deliver publicly, led to replacement of just about half the paintings originally chosen, Including many of those I most wanted for the exhib., with substitutions over which we had no control.  These substitutions are all, I hasten to say, genuine and important works we are grateful to the Bunkacho, the Agency for Cultural Affairs in Japan, for all their efforts on our behalf but the character of the exhibition was significantly changed.  My plan was to present a new and fresh view of Nanga, featuring some artists who seem to me to have been neglected, playing down others who seem to me overrated.  I was going to introduce fine & little-known ptgs, and right some balances.  This was not to be; we end with a very fine exhib., but one reflecting a more traditional appraisal of Nanga artists than I had intended. This is not by any means an unmixed misfortunes may well be that most people here would rather see the traditional view of Nanga than a more private one. In any case, my lecture tonight will be, among other things, an expression of some of these more personal, biased, iconoclastic views on Nanga that might otherwise have been expressed in the selection of the exhibition.

Problem of value espec. acute in dealing w. Nanga, because its values complex, like those of Ming-Ch'ing ptg: can easily escape people.  Pioneer American scholar of Jap. art, Fenollosa, dismissed the whole school as "hardly more than an awkward joke," and others, while not so vehement, have similarly neglected it.  Where Ukiyo ptg & prints, which flourished in same period, have immediate & simple appeal, Nanga doesn't yet an involvement w. Nanga may well prove more regarding in the end. So Nanga has been given little attn., outside Japan until very recently. Japanese themselves have tended to hold on to traditional views abt. which were realty good artists & really excellent ptgs; continue to present as masterworks of Nanga works that sometimes seen to us relatively uninteresting.  We must understand their reasons & respect them; but we must also make our own judgments.  In fact, foreign scholars,


who are at serious disadvantage for pure historical research because of devilish difficulties of dealing w. old texts & historical records, can make signif. contributions in booking at Nanga w. new eyes, seeing such problems as its relat. w. Chinese ptg from new perspectives.

Before we attack the problem of value, a few assumptions should be stated clearly. These are all open to argument, but they are mine, and they are the ones I'll operate with tonight.

  1. Since value in art arises from the experience of the work of art, the aesthetic experience, and is not a constant attribute of the work itself as an object, if follows that judgment of value are affected by such factors as the circumstances under of the newer, and particularly by his is sufficiently sensitized to the particular language of an artistic tradition, its conventions, its stylistic distinctions, he can't move far enough into the individual work of art, experience it fully enough, to asses it effectively. But apart from this, one's background affects one's judgments, an Occidental will find different qualities occasion­—(Wang Yüan-ch’I and Taiga).
  1. Nevertheless, this doesn't mean that value is a purely relative matter, reducible to personal preference, it only means that one's judgment can be or some
  1. catalog 't by any means depend on how close a resemblance they attained to their Chinese models;  on contrary, they are often at their best when they depart most thoroughly from Chinese Models. In broader sense, I think finest when it is most Japanese, this is part of why we tend to admire Sotatsü more than Kanō

With these premises, let's look at Nanga, I want to begin w, example of what I mean about context in which work exper. affecting one's evaluation of it.

S.S. Ptg by Nukina Kaioku, mid-19c.  Nanga artist, not rep, in exhib, Pub. recently in Kukina Magazine as one of Kaloku's finest works, a judgement I quite agree with.  Winter LS; has qual. of monumentality wild grandeur not often found in later Jap. Ptg;  dynamic, strong comp.  On its own terms, then, fine ptg could be presented that way, and I don't think many would disagree.


But could be presented in another way.  Kaioku says in insc. that it is based on Ch. ptg. of Yüan dyn, which he saw on trip.  If we know Yüan ptg, we can guess at what kind of picture he saw.

S.S Kuo Hsi, T'ang Ti, Origin of comp., & style, back in 11th cent.  China, w. great landscapist Kuo Hsi. "Early Spring," 1072.  This imitated by many later artists one is T'ang Ti, Yüan master, early 14th cent.  I use this in Ch. art classes to illustrate degeneration of Sung LS styles in later times. Subtle effects of space, atmosphere, light, all lost naturalness of Coras which is essential to original gives way to grotesque, unnatural shapes.  In this context, Tang Ti's ptg must be seen as a debased imitation of Kuo Hsi's great original.

S. And in this context, Kaioku's Is seen as a further distortion & debasement of the type, based perhaps on crude copy of some such ptg as T'ang Ti's, too far from orig. source to catch more than fragments of it, or to achieve any really creative transformation of the style. Same ptg as before; but can't be looked at w. same eyes by anyone who knows what it is based on; for him, not same ptg.  In similar way, Sesshū loses much of his attraction when one knows the Ming styles he derives from, and sees what he has done with there.

S.S. For such reasons, I think Ken & Nankai, two of pioneers of Nanga rep. in our exhib., fail to come through as really creative, original artists; they imitate what they know of Ch. ptg, with limited understanding because of their limited acquaintance good originals; they are historically important in introducing compositional types, new motifs to Jap arts but they do not originate really interesting, viable styles. Their works suggest that they were more concerned w. conforming to their models than w. producing good paintings; their artistic motivations seem wrong.  They were primarily scholars, for whom ptg, was part of Chinese literati culture they admired, and to be practiced for that reason.  Not a good enough reason.

S. I have said in catalog that 3rd of early masters, Hyakusen, is a far better ptr than either, and a really crucial figure in the early dev. of Nanga; it is he, more than anyone else, who sets the direction it is to take. But ptgs, we have in exhib,, although both good works, don't illustrate this ideally.   This never LS, which was to be included but was eliminated for complicated reasons, would have made the point much better.  Beside Kien's picture, it seems far more sensitive, more Japanese; Kien follows conventional pattern for willows, Hyakusen treats them as soft, windblown surface, Hyakusen is lovingly concerned w. textures, w. construction of house, w. ruffling of water by wind; his is a poetic a sensuous involvement w. world that is quite beyond Kien.  His fresh, even ingenuous approach is seen for instance in drawing of middle-ground houses; that they so clearly anticipate Buson Is no accident; Buson, who likewise was a poet as well as a ptr, clearly learned a great deal from him, as did Taiga. 

S.S. In this LS ptg by Hyakusen, now in a US collection, he explores the new possibilities of roch, grassy surfaces built up w. soft brushstrokes—effects suite unknown to Jap. ptg earlier.  Again, Buson was his heir, as were others.  The result is a new style, not dust an imitation; and a very satisfying picture.  

S.S. In some of his ptgs, he imitates Chinese styles of late Ming period very closely one can even identify the artist he's imitation, sometimes. Here, prob., Ts'ui Tgu-chung.  He understands better than any other Jap. ptr of his time the values of brushwork in Ch ptg, and of subtle plays of ink tone; uses them to define forms, clarify their relat. in space. 

S. What is ordinarily said abt how early Nanga artists unfamiliar w. Ch. brushwork, because they worked in a large part from woodblock books rather than from orig. ptgs, has to be qualified for case of Hyakusen.  Perhaps of Chinese ancestry is this significant?  Not ready to say.  He is an artist who demands a lot more attn.; I myself mean to work seriously on him in coming year in Japan. Ptr of remarkable breadth doing things that no other Jap ptr of his age was capable of.  And yet never highly regarded as ptr.  His surviving productions display such diversity of style that hard to see whole, as coherent artistic fig.  

S. Ikeno Taiga is another complex figure, whose works also display an amazing diversity.  In earliest work in exhib., charming handscroll of 1750 we see him working in linear style; little substance of forms, little modulation of any kind in brushwork.  Can do entertaining ptgs this way, but not moving ones, or great ones. 

S.S. Taiga was heavily affected by his study of Chinese picture books printed by woodblock, espec. Mustard Seed Garden Manyal of Ptg., of which good Jap. edition was available by his time, in addition to Ch, ones.  Here is ptg in Freer Gal., one of pair, rep. Red Cliff.  Drawing in deep back, hard line color shading smooth ft sudden trees done w. comb, of ink pattern ft color wash.  

S. Source of all this seen if ptg. compared w. leaf from Mustard Seed Garden Manual Taiga has simply transmuted a print style into a painting style.  Whether he assume Ch ptgs looked like the prints-which of course they don't-- hard to say. What matters is that with this as his basis, he was able to create brilliant ft original new style, one that was completely Japanese, not derivative in any negative sense. And it's when he does so that Taiga comes into his down as artist of first rank. Here, transformation not really thorough drawing rather heavy-handed, forms don't hold together ideally, little solidity or depth. 

S.S. A screen rep, the views of Hsiao & Hsiang, similar to one that was to have been in exhib. but was deleted, represents the style of Taiga that seems to me 


his finest, in which elements of Woodblock style have been turned into a decorative manner of great beauty, quite in harmony w. Japanese trad. of Kōrin; which was certainly a strong inf. on Taiga. "Pointillist" treatment of tree foliage derives from necessities of block-cutting—but done by Taiga in spots of color, in way that strikes us, of course, as anticipating Seurat or Signac.  However one may feel abt that—limitation of tech to certain areas of course constitutes fundamental dif. from Seurat's method—it provides an enchanting visual surface, at that nice point between naturalistic description and abstraction that the scholar-artists of both China 4 Japan so often seem to be aiming for. 

S. Detail, from reprod. in book by Mr. Suzuki Sumumu, leading Japanese authority on Nanga, who has eyes for its abstract qual., whom I would certainly exempt from my remark on the traditionalism of Jap. scholarship of Nanga, and to whom I owe a great deal of what I have learned about it.  Taiga is an artist to be seen close-up much e details needed not a great compositionalist, but provides many small delights to anyone willing to become absorbed into fabric of his ptgs. 

S.S. Happily, this most engaging style of Taiga’s is superbly represented in a single screen in exhib., belonging to Mr. & Mrs. Jackson Burke, who are, for this exhib., the real founders of the feast.  Composition of whole features a flattening of space, tilting of ground plane, that is part of Jap. heritage of Sotatsu & Korea.  By the time he paints this, Taiga is totally in command of his resources, self-sufficient & sure. He is able to set massive forms agst delicate ones and hold them all in balance; he can repeat patterns over extended areas without ever inducing monotony; distort space w„ a fine freedom, all the while making it clear ft plausible. 

S. Full of such subtleties as setting pure white of robe agst ivory white of 

Paper; color-dotted tree foliage.  He creates an extraordinary sense of space 

in context of flat, repeated patterns.  Same can be said of great dec. school masters. 

S. Genius of Jap ptrs often in capacity for giving sense of endless variety w/in 

decorative repetitions of shapes; this is just what Taiga does.  Control of ink 

gradations has much to do w. it. 

S. Two more details let's just look.  

S. Another 

S. In other ptgs, Taiga achieves effects that are unknown to art otherwise before van Gogh—this one of most remarkable of his ptgs, LS of Mt. O-mei.  The intensity and visual excitement evoked here raise Taiga far above the routine level of so much of his work--and in that routine category I would include the Views of Kyoto and Six Distances landscapes in the exhibition.  This is a side of Taiga that I would have stressed sore, if quite free in selection.  

S. On the other hand, two very fine works were added by Bunkacho album of 

LS in Suntory Mus, and this very beautiful "White Clouds and Red-leafed Trees." 


S.S. 0ne of the artists I mentioned who seems to me unjustly neglected is Kuwayama Gyokushū, who seldom appears in Jap, exhibitions or books on Nanga, but should. This ptg by him in show; first deleted, then, on protest, restored.  Like Taiga, works in combination of flat areas of color and repeated linear or dotted patterns, and tension between this existence of ptg as abstract pattern and its existence as image of nature gives It much of its interest, Gyokushū was the one who said Kōrin should, be included in "So. School" (Nanga) of Japan; evidently admired him.  But dec. style as practiced by earlier Jap. artists tended to be rather bland in expression; best of Nanga masters combine visual appeal of that trad. w. expressive intensity of Ch. individualist masters. 

S.S.  Two leaves from album by this extraordinary painter. I am continually amazed & a bit depressed that so many people, including certain reviewers of exhib., insist on seeing all Oriental ptgs, whatever they may look like, as essentially the same thing, that is, as sensitive & evocative interpretations of nature, always imbued with a   special Oriental spirituality. If one could somehow reprod., ptg by one of Fauves In Ink & colors on silk & mount it as scroll & exhibit it as Japanese, they would say the same things abt it.  Well. 

S.S.  A somewhat milder but also very int. artist of this period, not rep. in exhib,. is KōFuyō, seen here in alb. owned by Burkes.  He, too, sees Chinese conventions for their potential as pattern; Chinese way of applying texture to rocks, used here with high degree of uniformity, for very rich, tactile surfaces.  Alb. In Chinese styles again, like Hyakusen's, ptg that could only have been done w. some knowledge of Chinese originals behind it.  And also like Hyakusen, creative use of source, by no means mere copy. 

S. Ptr who is not one of my favorites, but who is now rep. In show, is Noro Kaiseki. Studied w. Gyokushu, perhaps later w. Taiga.  Year before he ptg this, 1810, had chance to see  & copy version of famous work by Ch. master Huang Kung-wang; greatly affected his style.  Here he imitates HKW style (or late derivative of it) in rather dry & mechanical ways may have seemed interesting to his contemp., to whom style was new, but in historical perspective, I think it loses its interest, except as document. 

S.S. One of great masters of Hang is Buson; these are two very fine ptgs by him in exhib. Buson, although always aspired w. Taiga, was a very dif. kind of artist.  He has the eye of a poet, both attached to sensuous surface of the world & seeking for underlying meanings.  Abstract patterns & emphatic visual stimulation have little place in his formal repertory where Taiga likes to pull ptg to front plane, make it vibrate there, Buson draws back into soft depths in love w. sunlight, wind, the leafy textures of bamboo groves and trees, the flowing surfaces of hills.  His attachment to all the shifting appearance of natural scenery, and the sensitivity with which he portrays it, make him something of an exceptional figure among Nanga artists; if we looked to the others for these qualities, most of them would receive low marks. Both these paintings show this side of Buson at its best.  

S. Early work, in exhib,--interesting for showing early stage in his dev., but this an academic concern I wouldn't have put it in exhib.  Harsh, heavy-handed style; lacks qualities we admire in Buson, w/o others to compensate.  

S.S  As a poet, Buson transmits feeling of being in nature; draws in quite dif. range of responses than Taiga, evoking direct, first-hand emotional exper., where Taiga plays on the culturally conditioned and the allusive.  These details are from screen owned by Burkes. 

S.S. "Night Over the City"--ptg we failed to get—city of Kyoto, in snow; few spots of red, to suggest warmth, but sombre wintry sky hangs over it all, A poet's ptg: simple, direct, w/o obvious finish or refinement. From Ch. p.v. would look unpardonably sloppy; their simple rule is never muddle up your washes. But Buson has done just that, and makes the result turn into passage that is exactly right for rendering the appearance and the feel of a night sky with flurries of snow. (Mt, Fuji in exhib, has some of same qual.)

S.S. Lovely ptg of crow in night sky in shows but his real masterpiece in this subject is this pair of crows on snowy branch. Buson ptgs at best function  as penetrating revelations of very central facts about their subject, as works of Zen Buddhisg masters of Sung period do; and they belong in that tradition. More dashing and witty than early ink-monochrome ptgs a less serious; but superb, on own terms. If we were to generalize abt the pervasive theme of Buson`s ptgs, would say it is the effects of the natural environment on those who live in it, whether people or crows?  That would cover everything from the effect of natural beauty, which inspires poetic emotion, to the effect of cold, which causes people to huddle in their houses & crows to hunch their shoulders and sit out the winter.

S.S.  Even pure LS, such as Buson's ptg of Mt. O-mei in China, partakes of this character; although seems to be direct response of artist to mountain that supplies content of ptg, actually based on a poem by Li PoBuson never saw the place--so again, it is human response to nature rather than scene itself that is theme of ptg.  But of course imbued also w. Buson's own experiences of mountaintops moonlit nights.

S. Uragaml Gyokudō, next great master of Nanga, has something of same qual. in some of his quieter works, such as this "Green Pines & Russet Valleys" of 1807. Impart to viewer feeling of being in pine forest, not just looking at it forces an emotional imaginative involvement in scenes he paints by insisting on strong visual involvement, One can't just stand back & absorb a Gyokudo ptg, as an image separate from you; ptgs, insistently draw you in.  Other ptg, 1792, reveals Gyokudo at a stage before he had mastered the skill of organizing ptg around clear theme, repeating forms & strokes to unify playing larger agst smaller forms, generally giving ptg a structure. In addition to special values I'm speaking of, normal aesthetic values of course continue to apply and when, as in this earlier ptg, artist makes all parts of composition about even in weight, w/o any unifying formal theme, likely to fragment his picture surface, as Gyokudo does here.  Color also ineffective as organizing elements he abandons it.  Interesting picture, but doesn't represent great Gyokudo.

S.S. Once Gyokudo is in full control of his means, he is free to appear out of control, w/o sacrificing basic formal values.  Play of dense & empty areas on surface, relat, bet. dark patches of trees & those of mountaintops, in typical later work, fascination w. bowed or avoid shapes, give ptg its fundamental structure within this, he can loosen disciplines of brush mvt., to reach high pitch of visual stimulation, suggest kind of intoxication. I won't try again here to describe this effect, or analyze way he achieves it, but will only ask that you spend enough time w. his ptgs to experience it for yourselves.  Quality of "controlled disorder", sought by Chinese indiv. artists as well, marvelously captured here.

S.S.  Of the two acknowledged masterpieces of Gyokudo, we failed to get one-- the great winter LS titled Toun Shisetsu owned by Kawabata Yasunari— a National Treasurebut the did get the other, the album titled Enka-jō or "Album of Mists and Clouds, ptd. around 1811. In this album, relatively placid leaves alternate w. others charged w. wild exhilaration. Tightly composed Autumn Scene, in which space created by visual separation of fine-line patterns a patches of red-brown color or ink wash the former pull forward, visually, the latter push back.  Other is all line, movement, no space, no stable structure; irresistible rising mvt created, which culminates in twisting mountaintop that shoots out top of picture.  Now, experience of seeing an album consists of a succession of encounters w. sequence of learns; artist plans it as such, alternations etc.  Some of this character lost in way album must be shown in exhib; no help for that.

S. Seen in the single work in our show, Gyokudo`s contemp. Okada Beisanjin might seem to be an artist of comparable stature; like Gyokudo, has his own highly formal language, uses it for ptg of great clarity & purity.  But having spoken of these qualities, one is close to having exhausted the attractions of Beisanjin; artist who repeats himself to point of monotony, and who seldom seems very deeply involved, either with natural scenery or the forms of his painting.

S. When he relaxes and tries to get more variety into his ptgs, the result is what you see here--lower half of Beisanjin LS in Seattle Art Mus.—loses coherence elements of picture seem formally unrelated, like collection of offhand inventions.

S.S. His son Hankō I spoke of in the catalog as a far more serious and capable artist, who can carry off with ease complex compostions that are quite beyond ability of father.  Bad slides of beautiful ptg in exhib.  Seems to have had access to more and better Ch. Ptgs; judging from his inscriptions, and from the traces of their styles that are to be seen in his own works.  Little question that the far greater formal & spatial complexity of his ptg depends upon Hanko`s studies of Chinese Works; he attempts & achieves things here for which Jap. Tradition would supply no precedent.  Says he is copying work by Tung C-c; hard to say what it could have been; prob. No Tung in Japan, and little if any sign of his style; but prob. Fine Ch. Ptg of some kind provided him with new technical means, which encouraged him to attempt so ambitious a composition.

S.S.  Will show briefly two more very fine Hanko ptgs that indicate rang of his style. This one surely owes its structural principles to some 17th cent.  Ch ptg, in disposition of powerful, blocky masses to build geometric framework, to which he adds charming detail and which he softens by application of horiz. strokes, tech, also learned from 17c. Chinese.  Detail reveal freshness, unhackneyed manner in which he performs all this.

S.S. Another, ansc. by father--so before 1820, fairly early.  After Wang Hui, Ch. orthodox ptr whose works we know from, recent exhib. Of Earl Morse col. But here Hanko, like others before him, turns Chinese style into Jap. one, specifically, insistent repetitiveness of Wang's brushwork transformed into decorative pattern in Jap. taste. Want Hui would not have approved; Taiga or Gyokushū would have.

Now, statement I made before, that Nanga ptg neither improved nor hurt by its proximity to Chinese styles can be broadened.  Technical skills they learned from China sometimes a positive value, but so, at other times, is attractive amateurishness. Naturalistic values can contribute to beauty & expressive depth of ptg, but so can abstract values. These are; contributing factors, but basic values, as in all good- art, are those of formal coherence, unity in variety, clarity in complexity, dynamic interplay of parts, etc.--these are the indispensable qualities.  Difficult to define roles of these ingredients in aesthetic experience—perhaps good analogy would be cooking, another Chinese art, in which function of food as nourishment is basic and irreducible, but an infinity of tastes & textures can be superimposed on this--none of them, strictly speaking, essential, yet they are what give the piece: its individuality and its flavor--fact that vocabulary overlaps suggests that the analogy is valid, and not orig,w. me.

S.S. Two contemp. & friends, Mokubei & Chikuden, regularly paired by Jap. Wrters (and by me in catalog): rep. two dif. Stylistic directions, temperaments.

Mokubei seems to me one of the somewhat overrated Japanese artists. In great Tokyo Nat`l Museum exhib. Of 196, he was one of five artists included.  I intended to reduce no. of Mokubei ptgs in exhib. To three or so; we end up with six.  Apart from his famous scene of Uji River, which he was so pleased with that he did it over & over, he was scarcely a strong compositionalist.  Usually puts ptgs. together out of bulging forms, as in one on right, or adopts some rather forced unifying device, as in ptg. On left; or else givers up altogether & lets it all fly apart, which often happens.  The effects he aims for are harsh, strong effects rather than subtle ones. Can be exciting, at his best; an also be exasperating: how can famous artists be so bad.

S. This ptg in exhib., 1830, one of most successful; his principle of organization is system of diagonals that cuts ptg into triangles & lozenges; everything conforms to his, even mists move in zig-zag patterns.  But this is mode of ptg of which the merits are soon exhausted; and an artist should, I think, have higher rate of success than Mokubei does to rank among the great masters.  (If someone comes back at me saying same is true of Tessai, whom I have sponsored so enthusiastically, I will be hard put for reply.)

S.S. Chikuden rep. in exhib. By spec. fine series of works; if you don`t like Chikuden after seeing these, never will. His virtues arise from restraint, rather than forcefulness or abandon; he produces his ptgs by patient, cumulative applications of small strokes and color washes of limited extent.  This tech., which leads to ptg of special softness & richness of surface, learned from late 18th & early 19th cent.  Ch ptrs, probably – same qual. In their works. (Problem: could Chikuden have known Chìen Tu.) Uses color w. great subtlety, but for decorative variegation, not like pointillists and impress., to render fall of light on forms.  Still similarities striking.

S.S. Chikuden's album, Mata-mata ichiraku-jo, which I-rendered, a bit
fancifully, as "Yet again one more pleasure," was
ptg. ptd in l831-2; finest
leaves are series of is, including lovely scene, of man playing flute in boat
by, moonlight.  Here, as. w
. Buson & some Taiga-, it is poetic values that we
must take into account, literary values.  Other, tells of shutting one's self
away from world, waiting for visits of old friends, this too is-one pleasure,
Ptgs can be enjoyed purely as beautiful pictures; but also full of echoes of
Chinese literati culture, pleasures of seclusion or seeing old friends, special
values assoc. with that long, incomparably rich trad.  Meaning of ptgs pertains,
as it nearly always does in
F.E. ptg, to an interpenetration of human and
natural worlds, rather than to either alone.

S.S. With this generation, European inf. on Jap ptg more marked; we have to take account of still another kind ,of value: historical value, importance of work of art as document of crosscultural relations.  Bunchō, on right, exemplifies this pleasant sketch, but scarcely within Nanga taste or style.   Left, Kazan's sketch for his family portrait of Ichikawa Beian, who had a goiter, considered a masterwork of early-modern realism, either this or finished ptg appears in virtually every Jap., book on Nanga, juat about my first stipulation on planning this exhibition was that we would not have to include the portrait of Ichikawa Beian, in that, at least, we were successful.

S. Kazan's LS title "Weaving by Moonlight on the other hand, is a fascinating, and beautiful work on any terms, doesn't depend on historical interest, although lots of that: Western style; subject that, had implications in political philosophy (Confucian emphasis on agriculture and small industry, fostered by Tokagawa goft); circumstances  under which ptg. done, Kazan under house arrest killed self shortly afterwards.  But ptg. exists independently of all this as technically superb, well composed, evocative rendering of moonlit scene, full of observed detail.

S.S. Finally, pair of artists active in Hagoya in mid-19c, Ghikutō and Baiitsu. These too always paired: but again, like Taiga & Buson, or Mokubei & Chikuden, very dif. ptrs, Chikuto needn't occupy us long, although is interesting figure in history of  Nanga; did a lot of theoretical writing, pub. books on how to paint in various Chinese styles;  but in fact, artist of very limited breadth.  A style, for whim, amounted to one or another schematic system of brushstrokes and forms; can sometimes put those together into attractive compositions, but seldom in such a way as to involve viewer closely, or move him.

S.S. The works of Baiitsu, by contrast, have among their virtues a great stylistic variety & schematic inventiveness, a real concern with air and light and natural textures.  One of pair of screens in Freer Gallery, certainly his finest works of Baiitsu outside Japan.  Scholars drinking tea beneath pines (other is fishermen drinking wine beneath willows; class distinction in art.) Baiitsu has mastered all the tech., of Chinese ptg for rendering space capable of handling nuances of ink tone, subtleties of touch w. brush, that are scarcely to be matched in Nanga.

S. He too has passages that belong, in the end, to Jap, trad, of ink monochrome more than to Chinese—Tōhagu, Yūjshō-- (won't try to define that here.)

S.S. Ptg in exhib. He is best known as b & f ptr in Japan, and in this, too, prob. best of late period.  But his landscapes, relatively neglected, seem to me his major achievements, forks out problem of depth in way hardly known before in Jap. ptg, where general effect of depth common enough (heritage of Sung ptg) but this kind of logical, systematic manipulation of space was not.  And yet, technical mastery not to be equated with quality  much of emotional force of best works of period of Taiga & Buson and Gyokudo lost by now, uses his superlative technique in cool, rather detached way.

S. Techn. learned, again, from studies of Ch ptg; both later, Ming-Ch'ing works, and earlier—here, one of pair of LS in Kōtōin, anon. 13th cent, works, sometimes att. to Li T'ang.

S.S. Some of Baiitsu has monumentality that suggests study of even earlier Ch LS styles, those of No. Sung.  This large, powerful LS done in 1853, when Baiitsu was 75. Dramatic in its contrasts of sunlight and shadow, and in its alternation of massive forms with hollows of space. By this time, no painter in China who was able to do this kind of ambitious, imposing LS, their aims and achievements were in quite a different direction. Yet, this is culmination of process of sinicization of Nanga, never came closer to its models.  Curiously, the moments in the hist, of Nanga when the ptgs look so Chinese that they might almost be mistaken for works of Ch. artists are at the beginning and the end--most of all, in certain works of Hyakusen and Baiitsu (taking him as the end of the main dev. of the school—Tessai is kind of aftermath), while the greatest moments of Nanga come in the generations between.  This seems to me, if these judgments are accepted, a final confirmation of the view that sees Nanga as fundamentally a Japanese school of painting, in which Chinese influence constantly played an important role, contributing techniques and new stylistic ideas that Jap. artists found useful and attractive, but did not, in the sad, serve as a determinant of artistic value the ptgs were good, when they were, in ways more Japanese than Chinese. .







 

CLP 151

CLP 137: 1983 “The New Chinese Painting: Out of the Dark.”

 

THE NEW "TRADITIONAL" CHINESE PAINTING:  OUT OF THE DARK

Less than a decade has passed since China was opened to us in the U.S. for travel, but those years have transformed it in our popular view from a remote and somewhat mysterious culture to a living reality. One effect of this great change, for those of us who teach the history of Chinese painting, is that we have become accustomed to a frequent question for which we have no simple answer: "But what is happening in Chinese painting now?" We have had to respond with uneasy generalizations, and by recommending the writings of the few specialists who try to keep up with what artists in the People's Republic of China are thinking and painting, such as Michael Sullivan (whose articles "New Directions in Chinese art," in Art International for 1982, and "Art and the Social Framework" in the Times Literary Supplement for June 24, 1983, are probably the best guides to the subject that we have in English.)  Most of all, we have tried to warn that the kinds of pop-traditional contemporary Chinese paintings with which we are too familiar from many commercial gallery exhibitions and auction catalogs—works that tend to replicate the styles of well-known modernmasters, and are chosen usually with an eye more to saleability than to quality—do not represent the most original and interesting work that contemporary Chinese artists are doing.

Now a more representative, and far more positive, view of painting in China today is accessible to U.S. audiences in an excellent exhibition that is touring the country, and will be on view at Asia House Gallery in New York from June 21st to August 28th, 1984. It will be shown at six other museums (see schedule at end) after its San Francisco showing (November 12th, 1983, to January 18th, 1984.) Titled "Contemporary Chinese Painting from the People's Republic of China," it was organized by Lucy Lim, Executive Director of the Chinese Culture Foundation in San Francisco, together with Michael Sullivan and myself. The three of us, working with the Chinese Artists Association in Beijing and its regional branches, received complete cooperation from the Chinese authorities as well as from the artists themselves, and were given a free hand in selecting the paintings.  The result, we feel, is an exhibition that brings to foreign viewers for the first time the most interesting developments in China's kuo hua or "traditional painting" during the years following the liberalization of 1976, the fall of Jiang Qing and the Gang of Four which the Chinese sometimes call the "Second Liberation."

To write "traditional" will sound a note of alarm in the minds of many readers; and to add that most of the artists belong to painting academies in Beijing, Shanghai, and other cities will strengthen their suspicions that this will turn out to be just another show of "traditional" and "academic" paintings—more of the imitations of famous old and modern masters, more of the bland landscapes and charming bird-and-flower pictures and over-appealing figures that have given recent Chinese painting a dubious image abroad.  The Chinese alternatives to kuo hua--Western-style oil painting, along with the "avant garde" experiments of the Xing-xing (Star-star" group and others that imitate recent movements in art outside China—all of which are unrepresented in this exhi­bition, have in fact been seen by some as the only truly vital movements in contemporary Chinese painting. What we have tried to demonstrate in this exhibition, contrary to that view, is that one has only to look behind the over-visible surface of kuo hua to find a great deal of vitality and innovative energy: in less-typical works by some of the older masters, or in paintings by young artists, women artists, artists who have not been much exhibited and remain unknown outside China.

In, trying to assess the achievements of Chinese painters in the People's Republic today, we have to consider sympa­thetically what they have undergone in the past.  They did not, first of all, inherit a very healthy tradition from the decades before the founding of the People's Republic in 1949.  Chinese painting in the first half of this century produced some notable masters but no really flourishing and successful movements to which young painters could attach themselves.  Mao Tse-tung's call for a new Chinese painting that would be socialist in content and Chinese in style recognized that the older kinds, besides being (from the new viewpoint) tainted with elitism, could not easily be adapted to the social messages that art was now supposed to carry.  Socialist realism in the Russian manner was officially encouraged for a time in the 1950s, and oil painting began to be practiced more than it ever had been before in China.

Traditional Chinese painting continued, however, with sometimes minimal accommodations to the new demands—a factory or a bridge construction in the midst of a traditional landscape, or the retitling of a conventional flower composi­tion to make it illustrate Mao's dictum "Let the Hundred Flowers Bloom." The relative freedom enjoyed by artists in these early years of the People's Republic ended in 1957 when the pluralistic "Hundred Flowers" doctrine was abruptly reversed by Mao; the Cultural Revolution followed, and the ascendancy of Jiang Qing and the Gang of Four, bringing twenty years of terrible times to artists and intellectuals.  The fall of the Gang in 1976 ended this awful hiatus in the continuity of Chinese culture, and opened the way for artists to—what?  Return to the styles of the fifties, as though nothing had happened between?  Take advantage of the new freedom to imitate what they had been led to believe were the bourgeoise and socially regressive tendencies of foreign art? Indulge in the strongly discouraged but not totally forbidden practices of abstraction, self-expression, the erotic pleasures of the nude? And if not these, what?

I myself had few clues to how those questions were being answered by Chinese artists until, in October of 1981, I saw in Shanghai an exhibition of about a hundred paintings, one each by that many artists in the Peking and Shanghai Painting Academies, including many young painters completely new to me. It was an exhibition that seemed to expand significantly the limits of the Chinese tradition as I had understood them up to then, and I left it with a more optimistic feeling about the future of Chinese painting. I have tried since then to see more of the work of some of these young artists; they are mostly well represented in the present exhibition, often by the same paintings that seemed so outstanding in the 1981 show.

The younger painters feel, on the whole, less committed than their elders to their Chinese heritage.  Their upbringing, and especially their experiences during the Cultural Revolu­tion, have left them with very mixed feelings about it; they are as strongly drawn, often, to foreign styles.  Clear traces of influence from recent Japanese painting, for instance, can be seen in the works of several of the young Beijing painters, such as Yang Gang (fig.) Yang Yanping (fig. ), and Zhao Xiuhuan (fig.).

The theme of landscape has presented special problems to Chinese artists in recent times.  The subject does not lend itself easily to expressions of socialist sentiment, but that difficulty can be circumvented by seeing the paintings as expressive of the artist's love for his homeland, always a worthy motive.  More difficult are problems of style, and relationships to old traditions. From around the tenth century, landscape became the central subject of Chinese painting, and most of the great masters concentrated their attention on it.  But from the early eighteenth century an orthodox school of landscape painting became dominant, discouraging variety and innovation. As late as the 1940s there were still prominent artists carrying on this orthodox landscape style without much change.  Art critics of the People's Republic understand­ably associated it with elitism and political conservatism, and urged their artists in other directions. A few land-scapists active in the 1950s such as Fu Baoshi, Huang Binhong, and Li Keran broke the orthodoxy with new styles. But these, in turn, have become the basis for what looks dangerously like new orthodoxies.

This is particularly true of the followers of Li Keran. Li's own landscape style, which sets heavy applications of black ink against strongly contrasting areas of white reserve paper and color, earned his landscapes the condemnation of Jiang Qing and the gang of Four, and a place in their notor­ious "black painting" exhibition.  With the fall of the Gang, the prohibition was lifted. Li celebrated his emancipation with a landscape (shown in the 1981 exhibition) that was blacker than ever, and accompanied by an inscription extolling the heavy-ink manner; his followers have responded with such an overproduction of inky effusions as to almost make us sympa­thize with Jiang Qing’s view of the matter. Fortunately, the past few years have seen the emergence of some promising new directions in landscape.

One who began as Li Keran’s follower is the Beijing landscapist Zhang Bu, whose 1980 "Winter Forest" (fig. ) reveals him, however, using techniques outside Li's repertory.  A pervasive characteristic of the new Chinese landscape paint­ing, whether the artist is working in Beijing, Taipei, or New York, is a dependence on semi-accidental and random methods to create rich, natural-looking textures: spatter, resist techniques, special manipulations of the fibrousness or the absorbency of the paper. These are basic to Zhang's, winter scene, and are interesting alternatives to traditional Chinese brush drawing, which may seem somewhat threadbare to young artists today.  Yang Yanping's "Towering Mountain" (fig. )similarly avoids the established brush disciplines of older Chinese painting, favoring a fine, stuttering line that moves over mottled areas of warm- and cool-tinted inks.  Her vision is sensitive rather than strong, concentrating on refinements of touch and taste, portraying unassertively the vines that lace over the surface of her massive bluff and the greenish foliage that surrounds it.

Chinese landscape painting has always offered its artists rich possibilities for exploring borderlands between imagery and abstraction, and these possibilities continue to be exploited. Song Wenzhi, a well-established Nanking artist now in his sixties, uses watercolor-like washes of ink and red-brown, with a minimum of sharp contour, to evoke in one of his album leaves (fig.   ) a sight that no one can forget who has ever seen it:  sunrise over the needle-sharp peaks of Mt. Huang.  Wu Guanzhong, a Beijing painter of the same age who studied in France in the late 1940s, has absorbed his know­ledge of van Gogh, Klee, Miro, and other foreign artists into landscapes that seem still Chinese, such as his "Ruins of Gaochang" (fig. ). And Li Huasheng, an artist of Szechwan who is not yet forty, stays firmly within the Chinese land­scape tradition, but draws on the free, calligraphic brushwork and quirky compositions of some of the individualist or even eccentric artists who occupied its outer fringes (fig. ). Li has already attracted some favorable notice abroad, and should win more through this exhibition, since the appeal of his spirited pictures is broad and immediate.

Similar stylistic choices are open to painters of the ever-popular subjects of flowers and other plants, and similar problems confront them: the enriching and inhibiting force of tradition, and the attractions of foreign styles. Xie Zhiliu, a Shanghai painter in his seventies who is also one of China's foremost scholars of the history of Chinese painting, proves in his enchanting 1981 portrayal of "Peonies" (fig.  ) that the ability to use an old mode to fresh effect is by no means confined to the young.  Applying the ink and colors wetly and letting them suffuse through the paper is scarcely a new idea in China.  But Xie goes farther than most predecessors in dissolving forms into suggestive blurs, and may recall Euro­pean parallels--Redon, or Nolde--more than Chinese models in the minds of Western viewers.

Zhao Xiuhuan's affinities are in another direction, with Japan: the mossy mottling on the rocks in her "Mountain Stream" of 1982 (fig.  ) is accomplished with a technique akin to tarashikomi ("dripping" water into a wet area of color wash) of Japanese painting, and the decorative effect of cool greens with ink and gold seems also Japanese-inspired.  The meticu­lous rendering of the plants, however, belongs more to the technically finished qonqbi manner of Sung Dynasty Chinese painting, and the style, whatever its sources, is in the end Zhao's own, and deeply satisfying.

Another young artist in the Beijing Painting Academy who specializes in flowers is Peng Peiquan, now in his early forties. Anyone familiar with recent Chinese painting will recognize at once his dependence on the lineage of flower painters that includes Zhao Zhigian in the nineteenth century and Wu Changshi and Qi Baishi in the twentieth.  But they will recognize also that Peng's style is not really derivative--that he has in fact accomplished what old critics set as the artist's proper goal: originality achieved within the artistic terms and standards of past masters.  Peng's brushwork and ink-values are no less disciplined than were Zhao's or Wu's or Qi's, but the disciplines are self-imposed, not accepted from outside.

Figure painting in China today presents perhaps the greatest problems for artists, who must deal not only with the distant past but also with the recent past, the ideological art of the fifties, sixties, and seventies, which was usually banal in theme and undistinguished in style, if one can speak of style in it at all. Younger artists active today grew up surrounded by this magazine-illustration kind of popular art, and many of the older ones were necessarily involved in the production of it themselves, so that their feelings about it must be complex.  It is easy enough, and quite understandable, for some of them to turn away from figures altogether and concentrate on landscapes and flowers. Others, however, have chosen instead to salvage what they still find acceptable from this earlier figural art, but to raise it to a higher level of quality and originality.

The Shanghai master Cheng Shifa, born in 1921 and now China's foremost figure painter, has been guilty of some banalities himself, under the pressures to create pictures that could be understood and enjoyed by people in all strata in China's vast and diverse population.  But Cheng can still leave his many imitators behind, when he chooses to, by turning his unmatched technical versatility and inventive­ness to new subjects and styles. He is represented in this exhibition by two small flower studies, an excellent land­scape, and a moving portrayal of the third-century poet-musician Ji Gang sitting in shackles and playing his lute (gin) as he awaits execution for offending an imperial prince (fig. ). Another impressive work in the monumental figure mode is the imaginary portrait of the Han Dynasty historian Sima Qian (fig. ) by Shao Fei, who at thirty is the youngest artist represented in the exhibition. Her vision of the Grand Historian invests him with a dark, rocky massiveness, remini­scent of images known from ink-rubbings of stone engravings, an affinity strengthened by the incorporation of passages from Sima's text into the surface of the painting.

Shao Fei is one of a number of young figure specialists in the Beijing Academy.  Two others who stand out are Yang Gang and Nie Ou. Yang's works are largely devoted to portraying the minority peoples of western regions, Mongolia and Xinjiang and Tibet, where he and other Beijing artists travel on study trips. His much-admired "Dawn" (fig.  ) portrays a woman returning from milking cows as the first light turns the mists blue-purple. His crowd-scene of "Mongol Wrestlers" (fig.  ) besides displaying his highly accomplished draftsmanship, conveys psychological observations about the participants with the same perceptiveness.

Nie Ou, my own favorite among China's young figure specialists, is another in whose works a deep sensitivity to human feelings and relations is a prominent virtue—and one with which our own painting of recent times has not been notably endowed. The tenderness with which she treats her subjects is an aspect also of her style, with its dilute ink-tones and near-renunciation of calligraphic gesture. Her "Dew" (fig.  ) depicts young people carrying lunch-baskets to peasants working in the fields. The theme is of the kind typical of the propaganda pictures of the Cultural Revolution years, but is treated in simple human terms, not ideological ones, and as high-level, moving art. Not all figure painting in China today escapes sentimentality and shallowness so well as these, but the continued devotion of so many of China's young painters to human subjects is a trend to be applauded.

Whatever our preferences in subjects and styles, however, we can sympathize with the contemporary Chinese artists' sometimes painful pursuit of a kind of authenticity in their works: authenticity as Chinese painting, as twentieth-century painting, as art suited to a socialist society, as personal expression. These demands may seem too divergent to be reconciled, but the artists are trying to reconcile them, and, as this exhibition demonstrates, achieving impressive degrees of success.






Chinese Culture Foundation of San Francisco

750 Kearney Street

San Francisco, California 94108

(415) 888-1823

CONTEMPORARY CHINESE PAINTING:

An Exhibition from the People's Republic of China

(exhibition schedule)


11/83-2/84


Chinese Culture Center of San Francisco (11/22/83 - 2/18/84)



3/84-5/84


Birmingham Museum of Art, Alabama (3/25 - 5/20)



6/84-8/84


Asia Society Gallery, New York city (6/21 - 8/28)



9/84-11/84 


Herbert P. Johnson Museum (Cornell University) Ithaca, New York 



12/84-2/85 


Denver Art Museum, Colorado (12/22/84 - 2/24/85) 



3/85-5/85 


Indianapolis Museum of Art 



6/85-8/85 


Nelson Gallery-Atkins Museum, Kansas City 


CLP 148

CLP 148

CLP 119 1999

 

Cultural Values in E. Asian Art panel discussion, prepared comments

(May 15, 1999) Japan Society, Japan House

(A ``Discussion on The Concept of Masterpiece`, with Nobuo Tsuji, Hans Belting, Robt. Rosenblum``)

Learning rather late that we would be making presentations w. slides, I began thinking desperately how to deal w. subject of masterpieces in Ch ptg.  Obviously one could understand question in two senses; first, Chinese concept of masterpiece, if any, as we can derive it from Ch writings on ptg & especially abt particular ptgs; and to be masterpieces and why.  I decided a bit arbitrarily to get through the first rather quickly, since it is covered expertly if briefly in Amy Poster`s catalog essay, & spend more of allotted time on the second.  I apologize to those who would rather hear more abt Ch. Concept of masterpiece.  I`ll be talking mostly about LS ptg, to keep discussion manageable, and because for some other kinds, e.g. great Chìng-ming cityscape by Chang Tse-tuan, defining reasons why it`s a masterpiece is too easy to be interesting.

Ch. Have no term that corresp. To masterpiece or masterwork.   Ming-chi, term that comes immediately to mind, less strong-literally `famous relic,` designating a notable surviving work of some big name artist.  We sometimes encounter statement that partic. Ptg by an artist is `finest work of his whole life` or `No. 1 Tung Yuan under Heaven` and the like.  But as a lot of recent scholarship has shown, such judgement were made so lightly, and were affected so much by matters of who owned the work, how obligated the writer was to that person, and so forth, that they can`t be given a lot of weight.

S.S. Huang Kung-wang`s `Dwelling in the Fu-chùn Mts.`comes close to masterpiece category wéin Ch ptg, as Lan-tìng Preface of Wang His-chih does for callig., on two grounds: the quality of writing about it to be found in old Ch texts, and the magnitude of its effect on later ptg.  It may rank at the top on both counts.  For a ptg that occupies that position, it`s a curiously modest work—couldn`t put beside Sistine Chapel ceiling, say, and expect it to hold its own.  That recognizing its value depends on a certain level of connoisseurship, and a somewhat inbred kind of connoisseurship, an acquired taste, makes its masterpiece status all the more secure, even beyond argument, for Chinese literati critics, who are inclined to relegate to a lower level any work that exercises a broad popular appeal.  I myself agree that Fu-ch`un  scroll is a masterwork, and have tried to say why in numerous writings and lectures over many years.  But if opposed, eg. By Dick Barnhart, who once characterized it as thin & scratchy and dull (if my memory serves) I couldn`t come up with a quick & easy defense of it.  Can be done, but not quickly.

S.  Kuo His.  But instead of pursuing further Ch. Concept of masterpiece, would rather turn to ours.  Some early ptgs. have attained masterpiece status simply by surviving.  Kuo His`s `Early Spring` of 1072 may or may not rank high among what what evidently  a fairly prolific output of the artist—we have no way of knowing; in any case, this is our Kuo His, very probably the only one we have.  So it more or less inevitably takes its place as one of the masterpieces of Ch ptg.  Its extremely high level of quality and interest, of course, support that judgment, which presumably couldn`t have been made of just any work by Kuo.  And again, its traceable effect on later ptg. Is a factor in assessing its importance.

S. Fan K`uan.  The same is true of `the` Fan K`uan.  But this ptg`s pre-eminence can be argued as well on other grounds.  Those of us who have taught hist. of Ch LS for years know how effectively it can be presented as culmination of long dev., as the work that triumphantly solves the problems of early Ch LSists as we identified them (or defined them),  achieves what other landscapists had been striving toward, and so forth.  I am as aware as anyone of objections to that kind of formulation, and could demolish it w.  arguments as devastating as those that are now,  I assume, running around in the head of many of you, if that were to the present purpose.

S. Yen Wen-kuei.  But after we have had the satisfaction of doing this, a sense remains that that kind of argument isn`t altogether nonsensical—a body of art such as early Ch LS ptg can be seen legitimately as a large collective project w. aims & methods in considerable part shared, within which successes & failures—and, yes, masterpieces—can be recognized (Relat. To Yen Wen-kuei.)

S.S. For later ptg—WM , Tung C-c—certain works have moved into masterpiece status by being reproduced & written about over the years as the outstanding, most complex, absorbing, exciting, whatever, work of some major master.  WM`s Chìng-pien Mts. Of 1366 in Shanghai Mus.;  Tung Ch`i-ch`ang`s ptg ostensibly of same subject from 1617 in Cleveland Mus. Are two examples.  It isn`t, of course, that writing or talking abt them in itself makes them masterpieces, but the possibility of doing certain kinds of analysis and exposition of what`s involved in a relatively full experience of such a ptg., the capacity of the work to sustain analysis of that kind, indicates the richness of content w. which artist has endowed it—the allusions to older ptg., esp. the ways the artist has used by subverted well-established conventions, raising expectations & then confounding them., and so forth. Any good Ch ptg specialist, given the right slides of related works & ten minutes to organize her or his thoughts, could give an hour-long lecture on either of these ptgs that would leave listeners w. no doubt abt whether they belong in the masterpiece category.

S.S. Wu Pin vs. ``Kuan T`ùng.`` Same true of this work by Wu Pin, which might be considered one of masterpieces of late Mind, and derives much of its unsettling power from what it does to a model that had once stood for order and stability in the world, the Northern Sung monumental landscape.  By evoking that model only to distort it, deny its stability and readability, Wu Pin determines the world view that lay behind it.

S.S. Honolulu, Sumitomo Hung-jens. When I did my Skira book in the late 50s, I represented the great Individualist master Hung-jen by the section at left from his 1661 handscroll in Sumitomo Col.  It wasn`t a bad choice, but now I would use instead the great hanging scroll ``The Sound of Autumn`` in the Honolulu Acad. (Story: exhib. Of  Anhui ptg. General public, newspaper critics, all bowled over.  Has been the same whenever & wherever exhib.)  If we set about analyzing why this should be so—why, in the midst of a whole exhibition of strikingly spare, linear paintings, this on held everyone`s attention, why this is widely regarded as the masterwork of Hung-jen--we arrive, I think, at a formulation similar  to the one I was attempting this morning: a fusion, or reconciling, of the startling new with the reassuringly old.

S. (Yen Wen-kuei). In a process I traced at length in one of my Compelling Image lectures, Hung-jen learned certain techniques of the Northern Sun landscapists for drawing volumetric landmasses w. readably sloping tops and receding sides, and then repeating these, more or less, to construct compostions with strong qualities of order and monumentality.  And among the artist`s many extant works, the Honolulu ptg supremely exemplifies this achievement, staying within the spare, linear manner of the Anhui school while calling up the spaciousness and clarity of Northern Sung monumental landscape.  Linear renderings of what had once been more substantial forms in western painting, when these are new works of art and not just simplified copies, too often end up as reductive, even parodistic. Whether it be Roy Lichtenstein`s funny parodies of the Abstract Expressionist gestural brushstroke in flat-colored outline, or, not at all funny and much more disturbing, Robert Motherwell`s late linear renderings of the form that had earlier made up his powerful  and deeply affecting ``Elegies for the Spanish Republic.``      Hung-jen manages to escape diminishing grandeur  of the No. Sung model while stripping away most of its substance, dematerializing it in accord with the whole Anhui School project.

With more time I would develop this idea, with more examples, to support my argument that it isn`t the radical move in itself, but a dynamic and successful reconciliation of the radical with some strengths preserved from the past, that is most likely to produce the masterpiece.  I would call on the musical analogies I like to use, pointing out perhaps that in early 20th cent. Music Edgar Varese and Anton Webern are not much listened to, while it is Stravinsky, with his early roots in late romantic Russian music and his later intricate and delightful uses of baroque and earlier materials, who produces the masterpieces that one never tire of.  And finally I would apply this formulation to characterize the whole later, post-Sung period of Ch ptg., to suggest how a post-historical art (in other, less daunting company I might say ``art after the end of the history of art``) can continue to have a certain coherence instead of flying madly off  in all directions, like some other artistic traditions one could name.  But for now I had best stop, having already exceeded my time and my competence.  Thank you.

Latest Work

  • Conclusion Conclusion
    VI Conclusion It is time to draw back and look, if not at the whole Hyakusen, at as much of him as we have managed to illuminate in this study. Dark areas remain, and doubtless many distortions, but...
    Read More...

Latest Blog Posts

  • Bedridden Blog
    Bedridden Blog   I am now pretty much confined to bed, and have to recognize this as my future.  It is difficult even to get me out of bed, as happened this morning when they needed to...
    Read More...